The point that I closed the book is where Dr.Samenow DEFENDS a man who was convicted of looking at child pornography. He claims that the man only did it to relieve boredom. THAT MAKES IT RIGHT?? Those children that were in the child pornography he was watching were victimized and forced to do something immoral and unnatural for some other sick person's enjoyment; to relieve their boredom. He claims that this man would have never would have acted physically on his desires. SO WHAT? He watched someone else VICTIMIZE a child but it's okay because he didn't do it and it's not really a big deal because he was just relieving some boredom. Sickening!
Tuesday, April 14, 2015
NEGATIVE REVIEW: Inside the Criminal Mind - Stanton E. Samenow, Ph.D.
The point that I closed the book is where Dr.Samenow DEFENDS a man who was convicted of looking at child pornography. He claims that the man only did it to relieve boredom. THAT MAKES IT RIGHT?? Those children that were in the child pornography he was watching were victimized and forced to do something immoral and unnatural for some other sick person's enjoyment; to relieve their boredom. He claims that this man would have never would have acted physically on his desires. SO WHAT? He watched someone else VICTIMIZE a child but it's okay because he didn't do it and it's not really a big deal because he was just relieving some boredom. Sickening!
NEGATIVE REVIEW: Inside the Criminal Mind - Stanton E. Samenow, Ph.D.
2015-04-14T22:48:00-05:00
Unknown
Blogging for Books|criminality|criminals|criminology|Inside the Criminal Mind|negative review|Ph. D.|psychology|review|sociology|Stanton E. Samenow|trash|